Marlboro lights how much nicotine

Read our updated Privacy Policy to learn more. How many light or ultra-light cigarettes would someone have to smoke to get the same amount of tar as from one regular cigarette? The correct answer is one, but only a handful of those who smoked Marlboro Lights, the leading cigarette sold in the United States, were able to give the correct answer to that question in a national survey published today.

Michael Cummings, Ph. Cummings' research group conducted the national survey of adult smokers. More than 46 percent said two or more light cigarettes produced the same amount of tar as a regular cigarette and another 40 percent did not know the correct number. Only 13 percent answered the question correctly. Other questions in the survey of 1, adult smokers conducted in asked about filters and the effects of tar and nicotine.

His study cites tobacco industry documents showing that cigarette manufacturers have long been aware that the tar and nicotine that a smoker actually inhaled from a light cigarette was much higher than the government's machine-based measurement of tar and nicotine listed in cigarette ads. Cummings recommends that cigarette manufacturers be required to support a remedial educational campaign to inform smokers about the real tar and nicotine levels inhaled by smokers.

Submit a comment. Comment title. You have entered an invalid code. Submit Cancel. Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Sign in Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? You could not be signed in. Sign In Forgot password? Don't have an account? Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco members Sign in via society site. Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Purchase Subscription prices and ordering for this journal Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.

View Metrics. Email alerts Article activity alert. Advance article alerts. New issue alert. Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. More on this topic Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products.

Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar. Related articles in PubMed Fully automated lumen and vessel contour segmentation in intravascular ultrasound datasets. Validation of a deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for rapid CT dose computation using physical dose measurements in pediatric phantoms.

Arthur L. Brody and colleagues found that low-nicotine cigarettes act similarly to regular cigarettes, occupying a significant percentage of the brain's nicotine receptors. Light cigarettes have nicotine levels of 0. The researchers also looked at de-nicotinized cigarettes, which contain only a trace amount of nicotine 0. They found that even that low a nicotine level is enough to occupy a sizeable percentage of receptors.

Thus, low-nicotine cigarettes function almost the same as regular cigarettes in terms of brain nicotine-receptor occupancy. Researchers, clinicians and smokers themselves should consider that fact when trying to quit. In the brain, nicotine binds to specific molecules on nerve cells called nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, or nAChRs.

When nerve cells communicate, nerve impulses jump chemically across gaps between cells called synapses by means of neurotransmitters. The neurotransmitters then bind to the receptor sites on nerve cells — in the case acetylcholine resulting in the release of a pleasure-inducing chemical called dopamine.

Nicotine mimics acetylcholine, but it lasts longer, releasing more dopamine. In an earlier study, researchers determined that smoking a regular, non-light cigarette resulted in the occupancy of 88 percent of these nicotine receptors. However, that study did not determine whether inhaling nicotine or any of the thousands of other chemical found in cigarette smoke resulted in this receptor occupancy.

The central goal of the present study was to determine if factors associated with smoking — other than nicotine — resulted in nAChR occupancy.